Talk:HMS Prince (1854)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Contradiction[edit]

This article contradicts itself:

"and carried 150 persons, all of whom were lost,"

"she broke up completely within ten minutes and only six of her 150 crew were saved"

Which is true?

Good point. I have assumed the contemporary Times report, not the modern day BBC article and changed accordingly. - I had already made this correction but lost it in an edit conflict, Springnuts (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS Prince (1854). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100328234607/http://timesonline.typepad.com/timesarchive/2010/03/the-loss-and-finding-of-crimean-troop-ship-hms-prince.html to http://timesonline.typepad.com/timesarchive/2010/03/the-loss-and-finding-of-crimean-troop-ship-hms-prince.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Bomarsund[edit]

Something to think about and tie into this article? He George Biddlecombe conducted the allied fleets to Cronstadt, and taking charge in Led Sund of the Prince steamer, with upwards of 2,000 French troops on board, he carried that ship to Bomarsund, and was afterwards present at the fall of that fortress. See https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Biddlecombe,_George_(DNB00) Broichmore (talk) 15:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]