Talk:Gun Control in the Third Reich (book)

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2014. The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gun Control in the Third Reich (book) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First sentence[edit]

The first sentence contains the text: "Gun Control in the Third Reich is a non-fiction book that describes the gun control tactics used by the German Third Reich from 1918-1938". There was no Third Reich in 1918. Can someone rephrase this? I'd do it myself but I'm feeling a little slow today. FiachraByrne (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC) Done Gaijin42 (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gaijin42. By the way, do you have the book and do you know exactly when it was published (early/late 2013)? FiachraByrne (talk) 17:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

fiachraByrne According to amazon its publication date was nov 1, 2013. I have it on kindle, but have not yet read it (which is why Halbrook's arguments are sourced to his journal articles and not the book, which I assume makes the same argument in greater detail. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll keep an eye out to see if its reviewed in mainstream history periodicals, etc., but that can take a while. FiachraByrne (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although I am fully aware that these don't "count" and this type of thing is notorious for cherry picking, being just plain made up etc, two of the book blurbs are from historians (i do not know of what caliber or reputation - but in any case, they would be likely candidates to write something perhaps. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I read through the "praise" section for the book here. Leaving aside the Law professors, etc, a lot of them - with the exception of Bowman, I think - are connected to the publisher in one way or another or are strong partisans in the gun control debate. Hunt Tooley, an editor for the Independent Review, has published on the history of Silesia in the Weimar era, however. We'll see, I guess, but it's doubtful that, over time, this book won't be addressed one way or another. FiachraByrne (talk) 03:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]