Talk:Gulf of Anadyr

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Russia: Physical geography High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

EB1911[edit]

The most specific information still sourced to EB is Cape Navarin as demarcation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankarl (talk • contribs) 01:20, 1 April 2013‎

As I said in the history WP:PROVEIT (using an inline citation) -- PBS (talk) 17:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unreferenced}} is the correct template as {{No footnotes}} assumes that one wishes to use footnotes when other forms of in-line citations are equally valid (and further the wording in the template "no footnotes" is broken -- see its talk page). However rather than arguing about what is or is not the right footnote, why not provide inline citations to back up you assertion that "5he most specific information still sourced to EB is Cape Navarin as demarcation"? -- PBS (talk) 15:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]