Talk:Guarani Aquifer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article is a duplicate of Guarani aquifer. That article is more political and possibly POV. However, the film reference might be valid and worthy of inclusion. I think the capitalisation of this article title is better, but what do you think? Should we merge the two articles and retain Guarani aquifer as a redirect, or vice versa?. An alternative is to relocate the content to a page following the format of Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System. Opinions? --ChrisJMoor 03:02, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for the merge, because it's confusing to have two different articles on the same topic. Psychade 15:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]