Talk:Grossmann Jet Service

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Advertising and Conflict of interest/neutrality[edit]

The article has been in wikipedia almost unchanged for quite a while without being criticized for advertising and conflict of interest. I know that this is not necessarily an argument against the accusations, but it should be considered. The article states facts which are verifiable. The External links which will be linked as References into the text give account of that. The company is in fact very successful and the media coverage accordingly very positive, which may give it the impression of being unbalanced. Instead of speedy deletion contribution to improving is desirable. The relevance of the existence of the article is unwithspoken as the company is e.g. market leader with 75 % in the Czech market. For this reason the article should not be deleted, which is definitely ALSO in my interest. So there is actually no CONFLICT of interest. Neutrality is in the interest of me, the major contributor. So, if there is a concrete constructive dialog about which passages are not neutral enough I would like to expand my contribution and rewrite them, even though I consider them stating nothing but facts. Ueberdenwolken (talk) 10:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grossmann Jet Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]