Talk:Greg Mitchell

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

re: Libelous Developing?[edit]

re: this (now removed) Mitchell's journalistic credibility began being questioned in a...

What is this? a joke? Blogs do not generate news and encyclopedias are not the place to report "breaking news" for the first time. Find a credible source or zip it. Skywriter 23:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

notability[edit]

With all due respect to those that raised the question, I do not think that there can now be any doubt regarding the notability of Greg Mitchell's contributions. His coverage of Wikileaks since the release of the diplomatic cables has contributed immensely to the the public discussion, and it has been a reliable and informative resource for many interested parties. It is easily comparable the Guardian Newspaper Wikileaks cables timeline. In addition, he has a book in press about the subject, which may be the first to press. Moreover, I do not think that Greg Mitchell's journalistic credentials could possibly be doubted. Let's put the notability question to rest.

Regards, proclus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proclus@gnu-darwin.org (talk • contribs) 03:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edited[edit]

Added to Lead to reflect more of overall article; added standard headers; reorganized article as standard bio; added more cites on some material; added more context.Parkwells (talk) 22:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greg Mitchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]