Talk:Green v. Haskell County Board of Commissioners

This page was proposed for deletion by Blanchardb (talk · contribs) on 1 April 2010 with the comment:
Small-town controversy with no apparent repercussions outside the town where it is happening.
It was seconded by Cnilep (talk · contribs) on 2010-04-02 with the comment:
See also WP:NOTNEWS.
It was contested by Bearian (talk · contribs) on 2010-04-06 with the comment:
real notable case

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed POV and Copyedit tags[edit]

I copyedited and I think it reads fine for now. Also, assuming the passages without citation are in fact true I don't think anything in it is not NPOV. I might try to find some sources for the stuff, but if not, hopefully some other editor sometime will be nice enough to fix the remaining issues. --MonsieurKovacs (talk) 18:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After thinking about it a couple days, it's clear that the part about the minister calling for a lynching is a major WP:BLP problem unless it can be sourced. I haven't found any verification, so I removed it. The other unsourced claims don't attack a living person, so I'm leaving them in for now. --MonsieurKovacs (talk) 07:04, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of prod[edit]

I removed the proposed deletion tag because this case reached the Supreme Court of the United States. Bearian (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]