Talk:Great Rail Journeys

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, AngusWOOF, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 2013-01-08. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

I have made some changes to the article - rewritten to make it a little more readable and took out a couple of POV statements. I am a current employee, so I hope it is acceptable for me to edit the information - I have tried to keep the tone of my new text NPOV and factual. Brickie 17:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Brickie[reply]

Looks a lot better, I started the article but it was pretty lame, I used to work there too :) --Hamish (Talk) 18:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It still has tone issues including the environmental statements and growing popularity paragraphs, which seem to come copy-pasted from company literature. WP:MISSION It needs to be referenced by secondary media sources not from the company. When it's cleaned up please resubmit for copyediting. AngusWOOF (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed sections that read like an ad 109.232.60.106 (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]