Talk:Grantsburg, Wisconsin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Grantsburg, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Longitude[edit]

The longitude given in Geography is not the same as in the infobox. The difference isn't huge ... but why is there a difference at all?
Geography has 92°41′4″W, and gives the decimal form as -92.684718 - but the decimal form works out to be 92°41′4.9848″W; i.e. it should be 92°41′5″W.
The infobox has 92°44′2″W - a difference of just under 3′, which equates to about 3¾ km west, well outside Grantsburg's boundary.
The longitude in Geography is very close to the centre of Grantsburg - so it should be used in the infobox.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 09:32, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics[edit]

2010 census - 1,341 people, 567 households, and 345 families; and the average household size was 2.28 and the average family size was 2.92.
Average household size = number of people (1341) divided by the number of households (567) — but this gives 2.365, not 2.28.
Average family size = number of people (1341) divided by the number of families (345) — but this gives 3.886, not 2.92.

2000 census - 1,369 people, 565 households, and 332 families; and the average household size was 2.32 and the average family size was 2.98.
Average household size = number of people (1369) divided by the number of households (565) — but this gives 2.423, not 2.32.
Average family size = number of people (1369) divided by the number of families (332) — but this gives 4.123, not 2.98.

So how are these calculated? Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]