Talk:Grand juries in the United States

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

The article is good, but doesn't address initial questions that an encyclopedia reader might have: Who are the people on the jury? How do the states select them? How does does it operate differently from a trial jury? 24.8.57.110 (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Compensations?[edit]

Are Grand Jurors usually paid? DOR (HK) (talk) 08:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timing of probable cause[edit]

I have a question about the timing of probable cause. I think it is easiest to see my question in this contrived example. Suppose corrupt police officers, without evidence, draw up a list of 100 serious crimes and ask 100 grand juries to consider 100 distinct charges against a person. Suppose during this "witch hunt" that one of the grand jury investigations happens to turn up actual probable cause that a crime may have been committed and delivers an indictment. Is this a correct decision of the grand jury, or is it the grand jury's duty to verify that the police officers already had probable cause, prior to bringing it to the grand jury?

If someone knows the answer to this, perhaps even how it has evolved over time and how it varies by place, would you edit the article accordingly? Thanks, 216.66.5.54 (talk) 20:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing[edit]

The section Secrecy (and maybe others) have a somewhat odd referencing style - using a mix of footnotes and in-text references. Could someone take a look at this? effeietsanders 19:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Missouri has grand juries[edit]

In the "States" part of the article, Missouri had not been listed as having grand juries. I added it to the list a few minutes ago. I'd like to encourage some lawyer/retired lawyer/law student or the like, to find a reference that correctly lists all the states. (I am none of these, and have no idea how to find such a reference without taking hours to do so.)

Articles at nytimes.com and at stltoday.com (the St. Louis Post-Dispatch website) have recently reported on the St. Louis County grand jury process now underway in the case of the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 9, 2014. I suppose that if I were to add one of these into the article as reference, this would represent "original research" in some sense. Which might not be any worse than the list that lacked Missouri: no reference was given in support of that version of the list. 72.251.70.112 (talk) 04:28, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Grand juries in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100718003858/http://campus.udayton.edu/~grandjur/stategj/stateg.htm to http://campus.udayton.edu/~grandjur/stategj/stateg.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abanow.org/2010/03/faqs-about-the-grand-jury-system/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.constitution.org/gje/gj_1973.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://wlcentral.org/node/1759
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/05/11/whistleblowers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NACDL report URL[edit]

I'm not sure how to fix this but reference #69, the NACDL report has a broken link. This is the correct link: https://www.nacdl.org/Document/FederalGrandJuryReformReportBillofRights

I tried to make an edit but got a warning on Preview and I don't want to mess it up. Maybe someone with more knowledge could update the URL for reference link #69. Just a suggestion, I couldn't figure out how to make the edit correctly. The sanch (talk) 16:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]