A fact from Govindachandra (Gahadavala dynasty) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 November 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that a hoard of 800 gold coins (example pictured) of king Govindachandra was discovered at Nanpara?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
The article states, "The coins are made of impure gold, and contain a large mixture of silver". Does this mean they are essentially electrum? Ther age suggests this is a possibility. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure. All the books call them "gold" coins. Tried searching for 'Govindachandra electrum', couldn't find any results. utcursch | talk 17:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Utcursch the translation of the Vishnu Hari inscription given here is suspect. Please compare it with that of the ASI, recorded in the Allahabad Court judgement
[1], volume 15, pp. 3692ff. In particular, it doesn't say that the site was a birthplace of anybody. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
According to the translation given in the ASI report, verse 5 reads "birth-place of valour which had successfully removed".
According to the Jha translation, verse 5 reads ""the birthplace of the man with unmatched valour".
These seem to be different interpretations by different translators. We can include both in the article.
I have been thinking of splitting this section into a separate article for quite some time. I'll do that shortly. Please feel free to update it -- I'll do it myself as and when I get time. utcursch | talk 15:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I was more concerned about what the birthplace was referring to. In the ASI translatation, it is the family rather than the place. But looking at the original text, it is referring to janmabhumi, which cannot possibily a reference to a family. This is intriguing.
I will try to do a spin-off. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As the court document notes, the translation of this inscription is contentious. When I wrote this, I had access to only the Jha translation mentioned in the Kunal Kishore's book, which is favoured by those who support the temple existence claim. Based on your I link, I've found another translation which is favoured by those who oppose the claim. I'll include this one in the new article. utcursch | talk 17:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
