Talk:Good Luck Chuck

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

Canada: British Columbia / Alberta / Vancouver / Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Location[edit]

Hey I remember stumbling upon the location shot of this movie, is this important, if so I'll post it Jedi canuck 23:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poster[edit]

There's been some controversy about the poster spoofing the famous pic of John Lennon and Yoko Ono, shot by Annie Lebowitz just hours before Lennon was shot. Should this be added to the page? So far, most reactions are coming from fans of Ono, Lennon or Lebowitz who considers this distasteful, and since it's not a big debate it may be worth waiting til the film comes out and see if it stirs up more controversy. Sentencieuse 06:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't give a quack about some so-called "controversy"; I am more concerned that this was the intended spoof. We need a citation specifically saying that the prodution company/studio/whatever had intended the comparison. Without it, the image and text have to go. Please find it, as I think it is a spot-on comparison. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think something noting the posters parody should be added. It's a parody of a pretty famous picture, and it's obviously intentional.

older goth girl[edit]

Who's the actress that plays her?Undead Herle King (talk) 09:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad advertising?[edit]

Should something be said about the fact that the advertising for this movie doesn't properly reflect the plot? Theelk801 04:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that should probably go on the page Advertising. Sorry about the sarcasm, but that kind of thing is hardly new. --Scorp Stanton 19:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beatle Reference?[edit]

Is it just me, or does the promotional poster resemble the Yoko/Lennon pose? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.135.66.172 (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, ya think?

MontanaHatchet 00:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also has anyone else noticed the name of the office building Chuck and his friend worked in was named Seltaeb, which is Beatles spelled backwards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.134.55 (talk) 01:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Error in the movie[edit]

In the movie Jessica Alba states that their are no penguins in the Artic circle. Yet at the end of the movie the two are seen on a presummed trip to Antartica. At their feet their were penguins, and above them is aurora borealis or the northern lights. Either they are in the artic circle with penguins they brought with them or the earth switched polarities. It be a good for trivia.--24.91.136.187 02:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, Antarctica is not in the Arctic circle, and there are penguins there. In addition, there are also southern lights (aurora australis) which are similar to the northern lights (aurora borealis). 68.62.178.38 03:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

Quite frankly, the plot synopsis sucks for this page. I'm too exhausted to fix it tonight, but I think it's embarrassing. I'll revisit this page in the next few days, but if someone else beats me to it, please fix it. It's horrendous. SkittlzAnKomboz

Reception[edit]

The second quote from Roger Ebert (about the Penguin biting Cooke in the crotch) was NOT said by Ebert, but rather Richard Roeper. The quote is from the TV show (Ebert&Roeper) but Ebert isn't on that episode. http://bventertainment.go.com/tv/buenavista/ebertandroeper/index2.html?sec=6&subsec=good+luck+chuck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.155.233 (talk) 08:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

African Penguins?[edit]

Is there any such thing as an African Penguin? The plot currently refers to these? Jamesb1 (talk) 15:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sex" links[edit]

Why is every single instance of the word "sex" linked? I'm removing the excessive trollinking.--Anon423 (talk) 05:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]