Talk:Goldman domain
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the G-domain page were merged into Goldman domain. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (24 July 2017) |
Regarding a proposed merge from G-domain, here's a copy of a reference desk discussion:
I've seen definitions of both Goldman domain and G-domain, but do those two pages describe formally equivalent structures? I understand that G-domain has been used as a synonym for Goldman domain, but is this the standard use? Klbrain (talk) 21:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Not really an expert on this but the definitions given in the article look equivalent. There's already a merge tag in place, perhaps the articles should be merged regardless since the concepts are certainly similar enough that they could be placed in a single article. --RDBury (talk) 15:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your view. That was my feeling too, but note that no-one has been willing to commit an opinion on the merge in almost 3 years. I've done some pure maths, but was rather (25 years ...) too rusty to be sure. Klbrain (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
— Reference desk, July 20 2017