Talk:GoJet Airlines

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airline project.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

St. Louis

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Controversy section[edit]

An IP removed the controversy section, and I support his edit because the section was not referenced and may have been false. Shalom ^Hello 02:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am an airline pilot, what was written in the "controversy" section is possible true. The pilots that work there are top-rated by the rest of the industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnalpha (talk • contribs) 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Above comment is only opinion and not based in fact. 199.227.166.10 (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nope it is fact, another airline pilot chiming in here. Gojet pilots are considered scabs, and are the bottom of the bottom feeders. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnalpha (talk • contribs) 16:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't mean he/she knows what he/she is talking about. GoJet pilots are NOT considered scabs by anyone who actually knows what that term means. 65.82.226.242 (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there seems to be a controversy, but I'd like to clarify a few things

Unless the term "scab" is being used in the "contemptible person" sense (which isn't very precise use of the language) then GoJet pilots are not scabs. They belong to IBT and are not breaking any strike. "Scab" definition
Whether or not Trans States Holdings (the parent of TSA and GoJet) is engaging in unfair labor practices vis-a-vis the "Alter Ego Doctrine", there has been no complaint to the NLRB that I can find.
All Wikipedia content must be verifiable, have a neutral point of view, and not be original research. Just stating your own observations or what you've heard from unreliable sources is not what wikipedia is here for.

With those points in mind, I'd like to see the "Controversy" section revived in a proper form for wikipedia. Davidyorke (talk) 20:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not to beat a dead horse here but the pilots working at GoJets are not scabs but they ARE considered to be scum by every pilot working at a regional airline and most pilots working for major airlines. I would know this since I am a regional airline pilot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salukipilot4590 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New ATC Callsign[edit]

New ATC Callsign is LINDBERGH per listening to O"hare Approach on 01 OCT 2007 on Liveatc.net Dougsnow 13:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on GoJet Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Separation of CRJ-700 and CRJ-550[edit]

I noticed that both of these aircraft are listed under the CRJ-700. Shouldn’t they be separated seeing how they are certified as two different aircraft? CZ3699 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]