Talk:Glossary of European Union concepts, acronyms, and jargon

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glossaries (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glossary of European Union concepts, acronyms, & jargon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Glossary of European Union concepts, acronyms, & jargon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glossary of European Union concepts, acronyms, & jargon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100813231455/http://europa.eu/agencies/community_agencies/fra/index_en.htm to http://europa.eu/agencies/community_agencies/fra/index_en.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Surprising omission: competence/competency[edit]

I would have thought that this is one of the most used terms, yet it is not defined? Subsidiarity (European Union)#EU competences might provide a start? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, I have added a 'holding' line to Competence (a disambig article) that I am sure could be improved (or indeed replaced by a link to a new section in this article?) --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mertens Group and Draft:Antici Group[edit]

I have declined these drafts, not because I think that they should not have separate articles, but because I think that whether separate article should be split out should be decided by consensus here. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon I came across the drafts. I have no firm opinion myself, there seem to be no further comments, and there seem no matching articles in any other WP. Another alternative would be to make articles for the two people the groups are named aftter and include the information there; they'd meet enWP notability standards, but no other WP has an article to base it on. I'd suggest you follow your own judgment, one way or another. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]