Talk:Global meteoric water line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2019 and 3 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SiminZhao. Peer reviewers: Rwalter00.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

I don't think mathematical formulas can be copyrighted so I believe the page should stand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jado818 (talkcontribs)

I think you are broadly right regarding the copyright of actual raw formulae (although I am sure there are some exceptions) however the problem with this article is that it is not just an expression of the formula. It is the extra words/sentences and the context within which the formula is described which is the problem being as it has obviously been copy and pasted from another website which is copyright to Arizona Board of Regents. nancy 09:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Global meteoric water line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evaluation Comment: Content[edit]

This article helped explaining the origin of Global Meteoric waterline, displaying an empirical equation and briefly addressing the application for it. A few more aspects can be considered to further build this article: 1. when refers to "hydrogen and oxygen isotopes", it did not refer to the specific isotope type for the two elements, which can be further linked to other Wikipedia articles. 2. the explanation of the theoretical bases for this topic- kinetic fractionation is jargonic for the public to understand. 3. the description about Craig's assertion needs to be paraphrased, and further explained in a non-specialist perspective. 4. the applications of this topic in environmental studies can be expanded. 5. images can be added to help explain the theoretical bases for hydrogen and oxygen isotopic fractionation and applications of this topic . SiminZhao (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some useful resources to further build this article.

1. Ian Clark (2013). Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC press. ISBN: 1482242915. https://books.google.com/books/about/Environmental_Isotopes_in_Hydrogeology.html?id=7UFZDwAAQBAJ&source=kp_book_description

2. Zachary Sharp (2007): Principles of stable isotope geochemistry, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall. ISBN: 0130091391 https://books.google.com/books/about/Principles_of_Stable_Isotope_Geochemistr.html?id=AVjwAAAAMAAJ&source=kp_book_description

3. Gunter Faure (2005): Isotopes: Principles and Applications, 3rd Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey. ISBN: 978-0-471-38437-3 https://books.google.com/books/about/Isotopes.html?id=tlMSAQAAIAAJ&source=kp_book_description

4. Gat, J. R. (1996). Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in the hydrologic cycle. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 24(1), 225-262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.225

5. Kendall, C., & Coplen, T. B. (2001). Distribution of oxygen‐18 and deuterium in river waters across the United States. Hydrological processes, 15(7), 1363-1393. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.217

6. Voelker, S. L., Brooks, J. R., Meinzer, F. C., Roden, J., Pazdur, A., Pawelczyk, S., ... & Šantrůček, J. (2014). Reconstructing relative humidity from plant δ18O and δD as deuterium deviations from the global meteoric water line. Ecological applications, 24(5), 960-975. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0988.1

7. Tang, K., & Feng, X. (2001). The effect of soil hydrology on the oxygen and hydrogen isotopic compositions of plants’ source water. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 185(3-4), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00385-X

8. Fricke, H. C., & O'Neil, J. R. (1999). The correlation between 18O/16O ratios of meteoric water and surface temperature: its use in investigating terrestrial climate change over geologic time. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 170(3), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00105-3

9. Johnsen, S. J., Clausen, H. B., Dansgaard, W., Gundestrup, N. S., Hammer, C. U., Andersen, U., ... & Shoji, H. (1997). The δ18O record along the Greenland Ice Core Project deep ice core and the problem of possible Eemian climatic instability. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 102(C12), 26397-26410. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC00167

10. Hays, P. D., & Grossman, E. L. (1991). Oxygen isotopes in meteoric calcite cements as indicators of continental paleoclimate. Geology, 19(5), 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0441:OIIMCC>2.3.CO;2SiminZhao (talk) 21:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]