This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
Andy Wood (15 June 2014), Abandoned & Vanished Canals of England, Amberley Publishing Limited
Additional comments
The chapter "Glastonbury Canals" in Abandoned & Vanished Canals of England, ISBN 9781445639161, is a direct lift of this article.[1] Luckily your article, substantially complete by 2009, appeared long before the book's publication on 15 June 2014.
In the use section should there be a link to the Meare Pool article?— Rodtalk 08:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes in so far as the Brue went past (to the west of) Meare pool; as yet I have seen no statement that it was connected to Meare pool - the latter appears to have been confined to the supplying and processing of fish.Pyrotec (talk) 08:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And a link to Glastonbury Canal at least to help readers differentiate between the course of the old & new.— Rodtalk 08:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at page 73 of this book, which features a nice diagram showing drainage of the levels in medieval times. It clearly shows Meare Pool as being a long way from the canal, but linked by the river network. --TimTay (talk) 08:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I bought the book when it first came out. I was looking at Fig 43 on page 217, the Pilrow seems to have been extended to the south east in Fig 43.Pyrotec (talk) 18:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
