Talk:Giles Muhame/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Oishiisou (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well written[edit]

Yes

Factually accurate and verifiable[edit]

Yes

Broad[edit]

Yes

Neutral[edit]

Yes

Stable[edit]

Yes

Illustrated[edit]

No - would it be possible to provide an image of Giles Muhame? Oishiisou (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmit for GA Review[edit]

While the enthusiasm of this new editor is admirable, the editor does not yet have the knowledge of Wikipedia policies, guidelines, or Manual of Style to assess articles. Accordingly, it is recommended that the requesting editor resubmit the article for GA assessment and review. Thank you, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 19:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I don't have any problem with this, the first reviewer raised a pretty good question on her talk page, and got no answer... why does GAN state at the top of its page that any registered user can review an article, if that's actually a lie? Khazar (talk) 07:24, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2nd opinion / 2nd review[edit]

There is a merge request at the top of this article that I feel is appropriate. Since there have been no objection, these articles will soon be merged together, making the GA nom moot. I'm going to quickfail simply because the article will no longer exist at this location. – Quadell ^(talk) 20:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]