Talk:Gibbon's Tennis Court

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Latham and Matthews?[edit]

What work does note 7 cite? Paul August 15:41, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, it got lost. Hang on... —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There we go. Thanks. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I also find note 3 a bit confusing. It seemed at first to be citing two works, one by Edward Langhans, and one by Deborah Fisk. after a bit of googling I now see that Langhans' "The theatre" is contained in The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre, edited by Deborah Fisk. Perhaps a better citation might be:

Langhans, Edward A. "The theatre", The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre. Ed. Deborah Payne Fisk. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Also since I assume that the caveat that "Some sources place the opening on November 9 instead" (btw which sources?) contained in note 3 applies only to the first use of note 3, I think that either there should be only one use of note 3, (placed where the second is now) or there should be two different notes, the first containing the caveat, the second one not.

Paul August 18:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I turned the caveat into a parenthetical; feel free and format the author/editor/chapter/book citations any way you see fit; you won't hurt my feelings -- I was just trying to reproduce from memory how I'd last seen {{cite book}} do it. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 18:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, he source for 8 vs 9 November was pretty much this page, talking about when they left the Red Bull; rereading that, it would seem a choice between the 10th and the 8th actually; oops. Digging into in a book search, I found little support for any specific dates other than the 8th, so I've removed all but that for now. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 18:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]