Talk:Get Rich or Die Tryin'

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How did Eminem have dominant production over The Massacre??[edit]

I'm going to erase that little bit of trivia. Check the facts and it's not true. --Avenger1000 04:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this is his first official albulm. the ones before were all mixtapes which grew his hype, as for the Power Of The Dollar album it was shelved before it's release and so it doesnt count.
Can some one change that statement that said get rich or die trying sold 30,000,000 copies the first week, i would chang it my self but i dont kno the numbers.

Still a stub?[edit]

This seems pretty thorough to me. What more is there to add?66.67.183.67 02:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"bound to get lucky baby or bound to die tryin'"[edit]

Anyone knows if perhaps 50cent was influenced from Bob Dylan's "down the highway" line (from freewheelin bob dylan) while making the title? anyone knows if 50 is maybe a dylan fan? i always said that dylan is the original rapper (listen to its alright ma') —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Beivushtang (talk • contribs) 09:53, 27 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Many Men[edit]

there is a article on all singles from this album but not many men??? and many men isnt on the discography page either? it was a single that was on the radio and had a music video.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.118.238.218 (talk) 23:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Get Rich or Die Tryin' (album)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Get Rich or Die Tryin' (album)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "dubcnn":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USA Today review[edit]

Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. USA Today (Jones, Steve. D.05. February 11, 2003) review of Get Rich or Die Tryin' (2003):

Rap: 50 Cent, Get Rich or Die Tryin' ( * * * out of four) Between his underground mix tapes, his association with Eminem and Dr. Dre and his feud with Ja Rule, 50 Cent has made his album this year's most anticipated (and heavily pirated). The Queens rapper delivers, in vivid detail, stories of the violent life he led as a crack dealer and speaks with the swagger of one who has been shot nine times and lived to tell about it. On Many Men (Wish Death), he talks of living with a bull's-eye on his chest, while the haunting, Eminem- produced Patiently Waiting recounts his success despite haters and industry drama. Party anthem In da Club, one of several Dre tracks, lightens the heavy mood just a bit. And though 50 Cent is usually about as gentlemanly as Snoop Dogg, his 21 Questions, with Nate Dogg, takes a relatively courtly tone. The rapper has excelled at getting attention for himself, and his music makes him well worth a look.

— Steve Jones

Dan56 (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Certications[edit]

it is certifed 6 plat not 9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Df2397 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios[edit]

In Critical reception we currently have the text:

Rolling Stone's Christian Hoard commended 50 Cent's undeniable showcase of skill, radio-ready tracks, and marketable thug persona in addition to the album's production for its dark synth grooves, buzzy keyboards, and persistently funky bounce.[22]

The cited source has:

"If this combination of big-name backers, undeniable skills, radio-ready tracks and a marketable thug persona make Get Rich or Die Tryin' a sure-shot smash hit, it also makes it a great record ... concocting ... club-ready and spaced-out tracks out of dark synth grooves, buzzy keyboards and a persistently funky bounce."

Obviously, the Wikipedia text: "undeniable showcase of skill, radio-ready tracks, and marketable thug persona" is ridiculously close to "undeniable skills, radio-ready tracks and a marketable thug persona".

Further, "its dark synth grooves, buzzy keyboards, and persistently funky bounce" is far too close to "of dark synth grooves, buzzy keyboards and a persistently funky bounce". In fact, its virtually verbatim and a copyvio. I've went ahead and placed these verbatim fragments inside quotation marks. Harmelodix (talk) 17:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What does this mean?[edit]

What does "Gets no cuter as his character unfolds."[30] mean? Harmelodix (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Get Rich or Die Tryin' (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrohead (talk · contribs) 08:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Lead
  • Features then-newcomers Young Buck, Lloyd Banks and Tony Yayo→they were coming from where?
  • Can we move the references to the article's body? (the sales and certifications cites)
  • Can we move "at the 46th Grammy Awards" right after "for a Grammy Award for Best Rap Album"?
  • Do we have a more accurate date for the album's recording? It certainly wasn't recorded the entire 2002, was it?
  • The "gangsta rap" genre is sourced with what?
Overall, the prose in the lead is exceptionally well written.
Background
  • Can we expand the section with information about the reason he was shot?
  • Is the mixtape Guess Who's Back? the one that should have been released with Columbia Records?
  • A recording can not be an album and a mixtape at the same time (third sentence).
  • You mention information about singles in this section, which shouldn't be the case according to the section's title.
Singles
  • Apart from the chart success, can you elaborate on the other aspects of the songs, such as videos or lyrical themes?
Commercial performance
  • Generally speaking, the section is not well researched compared to the album's commercial success. Can we find second week and worldwide sales?
  • I see we got information about the US sales as of July 2014, but the lead has an older number as of December 2013. Please update the number.
Critical reception
  • A page number is required for the claim that the record was "the most hyped rap debut".
  • Can you incorporate the Metacritic score in the table?
  • The accolades paragraph is not well researched either. You haven't mention the Grammy nomination nor the Rolling Stone rating. There are other accolades on this album for sure.
Non-prose sections
  • Please add a reference about the track listing (you can use the booklet if you have a copy).
  • You can use the certification table entry for the certifications.
  • Please be consistent with the reference formatting. References 2, 14, 15, 37, are not placed in a citation template. Ref number 17 and the second external link are not accessible. Also provide page numbers of the books you are citing in the bibliography.

I might start copy editing the article. I'll come back with additional notes once these are done.--Retrohead (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this! I'll be a little busy this weekend, but I should be able to dig-in Monday. Harmelodix (talk) 21:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Closing the review as failed due to the nominator's inactivity.--Retrohead (talk) 13:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 11:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Get Rich or Die Tryin' (album) → Get Rich or Die Tryin' – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, this article is the primary topic, because it is the most visited of the three, and has more media presence than the others. We can place a notification at the top of this article if the reader is looking for the soundtrack or the film. --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 21:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Retrohead (talk) 20:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose – the target is taken by a disambig page, which is the best way to handle the ambiguity. Dicklyon (talk) 03:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The film made 46 million dollars, so it is hardly secondary—a whole lot of people paid to see it. Which means the PRIMARYTOPIC argument is not as strong. Also, all three names at the dab page are confusing because they are so closely related. The disambiguation page is therefore needed. Binksternet (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. This article is misnamed, there being another album article, so this should be called Get Rich or Die Tryin' (2003 album) -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: For all of the said reasons above. KaneZolanski (talk) 17:30, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

High all the Time[edit]

Searching for "High All the Time" brings you here. That's ok, but it's a chorus in the song Habits (Tove Lo song) by Swdish singer Tove Lo. It's very easy to get confused by this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.236.234 (talk) 09:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Get Rich or Die Tryin' (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 January 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have clear consensus that the album is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Cúchullain t/c 21:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


– Most visited, most represented in media, and firstly released. The main opposing argument in the last request was that a film with the same title is released. There is a similar case with Straight Outta Compton, where the album is the main topic, and the film is secondary, even though the Straight Outta Compton movie was far better commercial and critical success (and widely represented in the media) than Get Rich or Die Tryin' (film). Retrohead (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In ictu oculi, doesn't Straight Outta Compton lead to Straight Outta Compton (album), Straight Outta Compton (film), and Straight Outta Compton (soundtrack)? Also, why do you bypass WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, which clearly lists the criteria that allow the album to be moved (original topic, traffic statistics, usage in media)?--Retrohead (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because I don't believe the album has more encyclopaedic significance than the film. I don't think any of them are that significant for an encyclopedia, and they're all offshoots of the same project. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's preposterous. The other two articles clearly lack notability in comparison to this one. Your argument "if two or more articles have the same title they must have disambiguation, regardless of notability" doesn't hold much ground.--Retrohead (talk) 21:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Get Rich or Die Tryin'/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
The article needs a "personnel" section including all musicians as well as technical personnel. Lacking that, it can't technically rise above "start" class. It needs composers/authors in the tracklist to rise above C class. Too, to rise above C class, the lead needs to be expanded in line with WP:LEAD.

Although technically this should be a "start", I think there are enough additional features in the article to warrant rating it a "C".

Article requirements:
Green tickY Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 16:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Sales/certifications[edit]

In multiple areas, it says things like The album was certified 6× platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) for shipping eight million copies in the US.

  1. Is this correct?
  2. Should we reword that? Even if it is correct, it would mean they're behind on their certifications or something, right? This current wording makes it sound like it takes 8 million sold to get to 6x platinum, which is not correct by RIAA standards. (Its 1mil = 1x platinum). Thoughts? Sergecross73 msg me 12:48, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The album has sold 8,5 million copies so far, but it is only certified 6x platinum by the RIAA. I'll reword it right away.--Retrohead (talk) 16:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I just wanted to double check before making changes myself - I work a lot in music articles, but this falls out of my normal musical interests, so I wanted to make sure there wasn't something I was missing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 19:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Get Rich or Die Tryin'. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Add year count since album’s release[edit]

I find that adding the # of years since the albums release is helpful for those who are in search of the exact age of the album. CanadianOntarian (talk) 01:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Get_Rich_or_Die_Tryin%27&oldid=1206740217"