Talk:German submarine U-96 (1940)

Fair use rationale for Image:Laughing swordfish.png

Image:Laughing swordfish.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Laughing swordfish.png

Image:Laughing swordfish.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

— Save_Us_229 23:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Gibraltar

Does anyone know if the drama during the Gibraltar dash depicted in the movie Das Boot, or something similar really happened to this submarine? Is it in the novel and if yes, are there any differences from the movie version of the event? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.137.118.241 (talk) 13:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it is in the novel. It's a long time since I read it, so I can't really remember if there were any big differences on that part, I can't remember any. Andrimner (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

According to the german wikipedia article the story with Gibraltar is real and happened on the 7th patrol. Here the english article differs a lot from the german. Obviously on this patrol there was a lot of confusion with the assignment to several battle groupings, which may be the cause for different historic views. However, Mr.Buchheim (the war correspondent, who wrote the book) published another book with his pictures and gave several interviews, describing the backgrounds. So, the general events depocted in the book and the movie are fairly accurate, only that the real boat wasn't destroyed at the end of this patrol. The movie is close to the book, but director Petersen had another intention than Buchheim. Buchheim never really was satisfied with the movie. There are a lots of details obviously not real but added for drama. The book is closest to reality, no wonder, Buchheim WAS there, even if didn't intend to write a documentary. His focus mainly is on the "sicial" aspect: life of a bunch of men under extreme pressure in a submarine. The movie is a lot more about cruelty and senselessness of war in great detail (no wonder the director's cut is several hours long). BTW: The stories in the subsequent novels are along reality as well. --79.229.159.9 (talk) 21:13, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File:RealU-96.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:RealU-96.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 5 June 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:RealU-96.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Deaths

Final sinking has double asterisks and is noted as "all hands lost", but the table says 0 deaths and the intro also mentions no loss of life. A knowledgeable editor should clarify this contradiction, please. -- Veggies (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)