Talk:George Sylvester Viereck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Intrested in Vierick beacuse of his Tesla friendship.[edit]

Intrested in Nikola Tesla(1856-1943) Friend of Vierick as mentioned in article. Wondering if Dr. Tesla was also "suspect" of Pro German leanings as was Vireick? Maybe even "watched" by FBI/Their conversations recordred? Are there any recordings or newsreel footgaes of George Sylvester Vierick? Thanks!Andreisme (talk) 19:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Edson Andre'[reply]


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on George Sylvester Viereck. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Viericks friendship with Inventor Nikola Tesla[edit]

George sylvester Vierick and great inventor Nikola teslas ere freinds.tesla considering himself a poet too! No mention in article of this! D104.34.181.144 (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Dr.Edson Andre' Johnson D.D.ULC[reply]

Paternity[edit]

There is a CIA document which states Viereck was the illegitimate son of Kaiser Wilhelm II. This is contrary to the current entry, which claims his father Louis was the illegitimate son of Kaiser Wilhelm I. Here is a link: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/5197c267993294098d50e7ad

To add to article[edit]

To add to this article: mention of his relationship with the U.S. lawmaker Ernest Lundeen. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sundayclose (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let's be professional about this, assuming that everyone working on this article is well informed about this subject.

From the Wikipedia article Ernest Lundeen:

"His isolationist views led him to be sympathetic to Nazi Germany. He had close ties to George Sylvester Viereck, a leading German sympathizer. Viereck often used Lundeen's office, and 'sometimes dictated speeches for Lundeen, openly using the Senator's telephones to obtain material from Hans Thomsen at the [German] embassy'."

If this sourced text is included in Lundeen's article, this information also merits mention in Viereck's.

204.11.186.190 (talk) 17:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No one is being unprofessional. The issue isn't whether it should be added. The issue is citing to a reliable source. A source in another article without a source in this article is insufficient. Each article stands on its own. Read WP:V. If someone wants to add with a citation, go ahead. Sundayclose (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]