Talk:General Osório Station

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Transportation in Brazil task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Requested move 5 February 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 22:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ipanema/General Osório Station → General Osório Station – name of station has changed. The Rio Metro English site now refers to the station simply as General Osório Station.[1] (the wording is slightly different on the Portuguese version of the site) Hack (talk) 09:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Hack (talk) 09:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment MOS:SLASH/WP:SUBPAGE it is preferable to not use a slash in the titles of articles, so a non-slash form would be better -- `70.51.200.135 (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, makes sense.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Unusual layout": Spanish solution?[edit]

The article states the station has an "unusual layout" in the form of three platforms and two tracks. This sounds like the Spanish solution, but without a photo or diagram I can't confirm one way or the other. Does it match that description? Lockesdonkey (talk) 21:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]