Talk:Gates, Oregon

Is Gates here or here?

• Originally, User:Rambot said it was at 44°45′18″N 122°25′11″W (44.755020, -122.419769)

• Then it said it was at Mapit-US-cityscale ~44.75502°N 122.419769°W / 44.75502; -122.419769 (Rambot Mapit-US-cityscale)

• User:Ajbenj added the infobox, saying it was at 44°25′18″N 122°45′18″W

• User:EncMstr changed the infobox to Geobox coor 44°45′20.71″N 122°24′56.44″W

• User:EncMstr also changed Rambot's Geography section to 44.755754°N 122.415676°W / 44.755754; -122.415676 (EncMstr changed geog sec)

• User:The Anomebot2 added warning message: was ~44.42167°N 122.75500°W / 44.42167; -122.75500 (bot was) suggest ~44.75600°N 122.41600°W / 44.75600; -122.41600 (bot sug)

• User:Katr67 changed Mapit-US-cityscale to ~44.75600°N 122.41600°W / 44.75600; -122.41600 (Katr67 mapit change)

~ denotes template used above not the same as used in article - name parameters added

I am changing the coordinates back to the original Rambot-added ones as they should be the "official", 2000 census gazetteer-derived ones per Wikipedia:Geographic_references#1 --Jason McHuff (talk) 11:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, at least they were all in the same hemisphere. I can think of quite a few cities desiring to be as much "on the move" as Gates has been. —EncMstr 01:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

FYI, I changed it to what Anomebot2's Geocheck suggested. For new articles I go with what what Portland State says but I suppose the census data is best in this case. However, since the coords are in four (count them, four!) places in the article, we should probably take out Mapit, which was superceded by Geolinks, which is apparently on its way out. I also often take out the Rambot produced coords. I don't think such a small place really needs 4 sets of coordinates links. But however many there are, it would be a good idea if they matched. :\ Katr67 (talk) 18:36, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

It's all OK. I was just curious to see all of the changes (the edit history wasn't long) and wanted to see the differences between the points in Google Maps in order to try to find the right one (to do so, click on any of the links above and then click the "Map of all coordinates in article" on the right side). Jason McHuff (talk) 07:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and I do think that the standard of having coordinates in 3 different places (geography section text, infobox, external links) and 2 formats is an issue. Its an argument for having a separate meta data system, so you'd only have to have, say, "<coords>" in the article and have the actual coords pulled from somewhere else, like with the Persondata scheme. Jason McHuff (talk) 08:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gates, Oregon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6HQu4Spqa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fpopest%2Fdata%2Fcities%2Ftotals%2F2012%2FSUB-EST2012.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2012/SUB-EST2012.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/699nOulzi?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6G4J8TS75?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)