Talk:GTO

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Also Game Theoretically Optimal. I can't do main page edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.243.10 (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 October 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Andrewa (talk) 07:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GTO → GTO (disambiguation) – GTO should be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Geosynchronous transfer orbit as the primary topic for this acronym. Other popular topics on this page such as Pontiac GTO are only partial-title matches, so have lesser standing than the orbit. — JFG ^talk 21:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why could geosynchronous transfer orbit be the primary redirect here? It doesn't seem especially prominent. I get a manga and the Pontiac before any result for it on Google, and it appears the cars are very commonly known as just GTO. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the proposal isn't borne out by the "GTO is" test in Google Books. Golgi tendon organ and gate turn-off thyristor and the Pontiac all three get more hits that the proposed target. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:44, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. After thinking about it, it appears clear that geostationary transfer orbit cannot be the primary topic. Its page views are not higher than other topics with this acronym, and there isn't any evidence of greater long-term significance than some of the others. Nohomersryan (talk) 15:53, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.