Talk:Future Cruise/Anti-Ship Weapon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History section[edit]

Leaving it blank at the moment, will return to it as soon as possible. TalkWoe90i 16:05, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is just one missile[edit]

There are

Flexis – 2015 Stratus – 2014 Hoplite – 2013 Vigilus – 2012

Phd8511 (talk) 07:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jumping The Gun[edit]

There seems to be a trend in this article to claim that Perseus is as good as a done deal when it comes to entering service with the UK and French forces. I have recently removed false claims that Perseus is entering service as a harpoon replacement and as the anti ship missile for the Type 26 / Global Combat Ship. These claims should not be re-added for a weapon that currently is nothing more than a concept in the public eye. We should be diligent in removing unsourced wishful thinking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by STKS91 (talkcontribs) 23:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2017/march-2017-navy-naval-forces-defense-industry-technology-maritime-security-global-news/5032-france-uk-launch-next-gen-missile-project-with-mbda-to-replace-harpoon-scalp-exocet-by-2030.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.181.206 (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Perseus (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]