Talk:Fuji (apple)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Use of 'domestica' In the Infobox[edit]

Is this a mistake? The page for apples suggests that domestica is incorrect and that pumila is the proper species name.

Clone Apple?[edit]

What exactly does this mean? That all Fuji apples trees are clones of each other? That the apples are a clone of another type of apple? It is not clear to me, and I don't *think* I'm that thick ... :-) User:xamian


Apple Weight?[edit]

90 tons of apples produced in Japan annually? That number seems suspiciously low for a country that enjoys Fuji apples so much. Is it supposed to be 90 million tons by any chance? Adityan 23:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

90 million is too large. A google search suggested that the entire Northern Hemisphere apple production is in the 40-50 million ton/year range. See, for instance, the USDA 2001/2002 report. Still, 90 tons seems oddly small. 138.163.160.41

Ahah, found some decent data. That source says Japan produced 963,300 metric tons in 1995/1996. And this site from Japan lists annual harvest at 900,000 tons. I'll update the article. 138.163.160.42

I corrected one statement where it said 12-18% sugar. This is incorrect, apples by weight are 9-11% sugars, with 4g of fiber. Most center around 10% of digestible carbohydrates. When it says "sugar" it linked to sugar as in sucrose, which is somewhat false. The predominant carbohydrates in apples, as in all fruits, are: fructose, glucose, and sucrose with minimal galactose and other monosaccharides. User:Bellybutton Lint

outside of japan[edit]

"Outside of Japan" should also describe non-American places. That section seems incomplete or just strangely-worded and horribly American-centric.

Very popular in Brazil[edit]

This apple is also very cultivated in Brazil.Agre22 (talk) 15:19, 14 November 2009 (UTC)agre22[reply]

Footnotes[edit]

The "Nofootnotes" template was added to the article in February, 2008. As of this writing, there is only one standard footnote for the article. However, there is a table with information on numerous United States plant patents, each with the plant patent number. Becuase US Plant Patents are legal documents generated by the United States Government, each with a unique number, there are therefore numerous references to external documents within the text, although not in the standard Wikipedia format. Is there a way to make this fact clearer while retaining the plant patent numbers in the text?     Jay L09 (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Production of China[edit]

Chinese Wikipedia states that Fuji apples take 45% of all apple production of China. I understand it cites old data from 2000; however I cannot find data that verifies the 80% in this entry. So I inserted a "citation needed" message. Zhxlier (talk) 16:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)zhxlier[reply]

this can't be correct ? I go to many fruit stores in Shanghai, never have I seen even one Fuji apple :( I know Shandong was big at apple growing ten years ago but they were mostly green apples, similar to Golden Delicious but better. 116.231.76.61 (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I found a source and added it to the article. Updated data is: In 2016/2017, Fuji apples accounted for nearly 70% of China's 43 million tons grown.David (talk) 17:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My experience is the opposite: 陕西红富士 is the default apple of many Shanghai independent fruit stores, the kind that loves putting some boxes of fruit out on the sidewalk. It is what "apple" means to me; it’s the baseline I used to compare new apples against. Artoria2e5 🌉 16:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fuji (apple). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]