Talk:Free Software Foundation/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Japanese font

Question: We are software company.Under development of software running on Linux, free Japanese font are in need. We are thinking touse Japananese font available under GNU,because there are MS restrictions that stipulate that TFT Japanase font are not availabe. If we use Japnase font under GNU, do we have to open our source code. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.223.94.248 (talkcontribs)

Please ask your question at the Wikipedia:Reference desk. Thanks. --Lexor|Talk 13:47, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)

Two links to same site

Removing the link 2 FSF India which showd a duplication —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.83.52.50 (talkcontribs)

Another category

I propose to add this article to the Category:Non-governmental organizations. FSF is more than a non-profit, as it sets standards, but in a nongovernmental sense, more of a worldwide sense. Any objections? Ancheta Wis 11:03, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

What standards would that be? Rl 12:06, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Infobox

Maybe put {{Infobox_Organization}} or {{Infobox_NPO}}?

Intro "through gnu licenses" phrase

The first paragraph ended in a sentence about FSF helping the GNU project ", through the use of GNU Licenses (see below).". I can't figure out the meaning of that, and it seems incorrect since FSF helps the GNU project in more ways that just using the GNU licenses. Normally I wouldn't write a Talk entry about removing such a sentence, but since it says "(see below)", I wonder if there was previous controversy about the clarity/meaning of this sentence. Gronky 20:55, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Car Insurance Protection

Do we need to ask for page protection to stop this idiot from posting car insurance links? It's getting very annoying.

JWP --Jwikipro 14:38, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

of course not, get him them banned --MarSch 18:48, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
I've added the {spam} template to the ones which didn't have it yet. --MarSch 19:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)