Talk:Frederick Kagan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Does this article belong in the "American military personnel" category? While Kagan taught at West Point for some years, I'm not aware that he was ever an active duty member of the military.

Is his religion relevant or confirmed?--Lord of the Ping 21:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Kagan[edit]

C-SPAN has Kimberly being the president of the institute for the study of war, not the executive director. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.53.213.60 (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Birth[edit]

Abenr (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Is Frederick's date of birth a state secret?Abenr (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a neoconservative[edit]

Here are two scholarly sources describing F. Kagan as a neocon in no uncertain terms.

  1. In Empires Without Imperialism: Anglo-American Decline and the Politics of Deflection. AmazonJeanne Morefiel, Associate Professor of Politics, Whitman College, published by Oxford University Press in 2014 that describes Frederick and Robert Kagan as

    "well-known neoconservative activists"

    The relevant passage is on p. 73
  2. In The Culture of Immodesty in American Life and Politics: The Modest Republic (2013)[1] edited by professors Michael P. Federici, Richard M Gambl, and Mark T Mitchell, Claes G. Ryn states

    The more prominent neoconservatives include… Frederick Kagan, Robert Kagan…

    --Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 16:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

F. Kagan's sister-in-law?[edit]

Really, I can't think of a legitimate reason to mention here that Victoria Nuland is Frederick Kagan's sister-in-law; anyone that interested in his family tree could check up on his brother's entry. This is Wikipedia, not Ancestry.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.98.118.115 (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick Kagan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"We're Not the Soviets in Afghanistan" Да,вы хуже Цйфыву (talk) 16:52, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]