Talk:Frederick III of Denmark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Frederik or Frederick[edit]

Please join the discussion here Lilac Soul (talk contribs count) 14:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1665 "returning the favour" or not?[edit]

The article is written in such a way the reader gets the impression Frederick returned the favour (of the Dutch sinking the Swedish Navy), when it seems more likely he was about to betray his alliance for getting half the loot the English would take. And the only reason this did not happen was a coincidence. I propose the section is rewritten. CapnZapp (talk) 17:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick III of Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]