This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Fray Juan de Torquemada is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can somebody explain what this means? Which article was rated? Which other articles were brought up to a B rating and why? What is the point of a bot giving automated ratings anyway? Ridiculus mus (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What it means was that this article was rated at B by one WikiProject, so the bot upgraded the rating for the other project banners for this article. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 18:31, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article as it stands does not deserve a B rating. It is full of errors, few in-line citations are given, and it is marred by editorialising : the retablo at Tlatelolco is described as "grandiose" and the Monarquía indiana is said to be "tedious to read". I have attempted to correct some errors but it seems to me that the article needs to be re-written and expanded - a task I have put in hand, which should soon be ready for consideration by other editors. Ridiculus mus (talk) 14:34, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
