Talk:Fort Sumner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment[edit]

This page needs a little help with language, but the ideas are good. Related subject is the Long Walk of the Navajo. I will do an edit and make comments on any major changes below. Please comment. --Rcollman 10:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion as a non native american, the Navajos were one of the few groups to be allowed to return to a reservation in their original homeland after being removed. In the 1860s, the Navajos were one of many large tribes. In the following 100 years, upon return to their "new reservation", they increased their population and increased the size of the reservation many times, unlike any other group of native americans.

Their culture, "The Navajo Way" was reinforced in the Long Walk period. In part because they were all brought together in a confined space, their leadership and culture adapted to a new situtation. In pre Long Walk Navajoland, they were really bands/groups which had clan affiliations and were spread out over a large area. Upon return they changed. A pretty amazing story from any perspective.--Rcollman 11:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A further comment[edit]

"Since it housed "combatants", it was not a concentration camp.Cazedessus (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)"[reply]

This comment was initially put inside the main page by User:Cazedessus. I put it back where it belongs, the discussion page.--Cgolds (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It "housed" some Navajo's who fought the United States Army and "citizens". It also "housed" women and children and old men, who were definitely not combatants. The majority of the Navajo and Apaches who were "escorted" to Ft. Sumner were non-combatants. Please note, some people do not recognize a difference between a reservation and a concentration camp. --Rcollman (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Sumner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fort Sumner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]