This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Is this page notable enough? TRBUFF 00:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think this subject is likely worthy enough for an article. Its history and the fact that it is on the National Register likely make it notable enough. Good work. --MatthewUND(talk) 01:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page is also notable because Ward Churchill used the fort in his fradulent research. Anyone searching through that research would be greatly helped by this page, as it is a subject of recently disputed history Chris45215 (talk) 08:28, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
