Talk:Forsvarets Spesialkommando

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:FSK Insignia.gif[edit]

Image:FSK Insignia.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Re:Former commando Bjørn Sagvolden; notable references being removed[edit]

There is an edit war going on in this article. And notable references have been removed.

There have been at least 3 articles in national print newspapers, regarding former commando Sagvolden and/or the court-case that he lost against Norwegian authorities. And facsimiles of 3 of these following articles, have been removed from our article about special forces-FSK.

Further references can be found upon googling. The following article, is the second entry on Google, and it provides some more references:

  • The reasons for removing references, are fleeting. Cited reasons include "propaganda". (The 3 national print newspapers that are the references, do not have a reputation for disseminating propaganda, as far as I know.)

Anti-vandalizition measures for this article, might need to be ramped up, seemingly.

And please be aware of that there might be a few Norwegian-speakers out there, who are sensitive about the subject of commandos; even the article about Ben Griffin (soldier) has been purged from wiki-Norwegian, because he was found to be non-notable !

S(l)ick nation (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Another sockpuppet of user:Sju hav, trying to promote that Bjørn Sagvolden is notable for a wikipedia-article. Finn Rindahl (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've tried to give the admins a notice Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sju hav. Let's hope they see it. 3s (talk) 20:07, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the reference-removers convention? How about adding notable references to the article, instead of removing them.

--S(l)ick nation (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Forsvarets Spesialkommando. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]