Talk:Foresthill, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Demographics[edit]

Sometimes the demographics get a bit silly. I quote: "... there were 1,791 people, ..., 0.06% Asian, ...". If you do the sums that 0.06% is one person! Sigh. -- SGBailey 20:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opening Paragraph[edit]

The Note in the opening paragraph seems somewhat out of place, though I'm not sure of how to better incorporate that information in the article. It would also be useful if there were references to back up the claims being made in the note.

The last sentence, about 'Foresthill' versus 'Forest Hill' also should have a source. There is record of a 'Forest Hill' in Placer County in both the 1880 and 1890 censuses, and the spelling of 'Foresthill' for the current CDP first appeared in the census in 1980. I cannot confirm if the two places are the same, although I would presume that it is highly likely. Therefore, it would make sense that any references to historic Forest Hill be spelled as two words instead of one. If anyone can find a source that indicates when the spelling change took place, that would probably be best. Reade (talk) 00:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foresthill, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]