This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Vision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer Vision on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer VisionWikipedia:WikiProject Computer VisionTemplate:WikiProject Computer VisionComputer Vision articles
I'm not generally in favour of page mergers, but in this case it seems that these pages carelessly overlap, and that at least this overlap should be handled explicitly. — MaxEnt 23:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support These clearly discuss the same topic and should be merged. Polyamorph (talk) 13:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this is an artifact of the above merge, but the phrase "that was proposed at the Velastin" is completely without referent. What is the Velastin? If it's a conference, maybe provide a date and a pointer to the proceedings?
JohnAspinall (talk) 16:09, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
