Talk:Flag of British Columbia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unless "defaced" is a technical flag term I don't think it is a well chosen word. And if it is, maybe an explanation or a link to one would be appropriate. Osomec 2 July 2005 22:57 (UTC)

Defaced is a technical term, I've linked to a definition Zedcaster 05:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC) This is the offical flag of BC right, the correct image??[reply]

Past[edit]

If this was only introduced in 1960, what was the flag before and why was it decided to replace it ? -- Beardo (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There wasn't one. fishhead64 (talk) 02:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since I was a kid I heard about the Union flag originally being on the bottom, but I've never seen a source for that and there isn't one here. I think it's an urban legend.

This article seems very strangely written, a minimum amount of information wrapped around a constant harping on Canada's imperial connections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.28.248 (talk) 20:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The story about the flag having the sun over the union flag is not true; it seems to be based on the stories surrounding the original version of the coat-of-arms of 1897 which did have the sun over union flag (there is a stained-glass example of this at the provincial parliament buildings in Victoria). However when the flag was inaugurated in 1960, there is no way that mistake would have (re-)occurred because the controversy surrounding the orginal 1897 coat-of-arms would have been long in the past and not repeated. --Davidjsc (talk) 16:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flag of British Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]