Talk:Fidelity International

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rebranding[edit]

I'm getting these issue boxes on Fidelity International:

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (November 2015)

I'm renaming the wikipedia page as I work for the company and we have changed the name of fidelity worldwide Investment to Fidelity International. If you could let me know what you consider needs cleaning up I will be more than happy to oblige. Adehemsley (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance. (November 2015)

Hi, Could you let me know the subjectivity that requires becoming impartial? Many thanks.Adehemsley (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for this company, then you should really stop editing this page, at least until you've read WP:SIMPLECOI. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I will maintain all effort to remain neutral and will not edit this page again. Please accept my sincere apologies, I was unaware of the COI procedure. Would it be possible for an admin to change the page so it complies with your issues and has the issue boxes removed? Greatly appreciated. Adehemsley (talk) 12:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fidelity International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to https://fundlab.credit-suisse.com/dsp/provider_box2.cfm?prov=21
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150510210956/http://www.ukpensionsawards.com:80/static/2015-winners to http://www.ukpensionsawards.com/static/2015-winners

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smear campaign[edit]

User Amigao seems to be engaging in a revert war with big destructive edits

without talking it out on the talk page
clearly removing useful information -- really any positive information on the company
and repeatedly inserts a "controversy" section about an investment in two companies which seems extremely tendentious and agenda-driven, given Fidelity International just like all other large fund companies invests into several thousands of companies at any given time. Also, this section does not exist in the pages of all other fund managers?

Edits in question: [1] [2]

Is anyone outside Amigao in favour of deleting the info that he deleted? Any other opinions?

-- Charles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.86.59.166 (talk) 11:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion between Fidelity Investment vs Fidelity International[edit]

Please clarify the two companies: Fidelity Investment. Fidelity International. Both seems to be investment-related but they have different logos. This Wikipedia page seems to include data from the other. Are the two linked, related or separated different companies? 2.31.230.47 (talk) 17:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]