Talk:Fidchell

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

i dont know anything about this game but when drawing comparisons with chess the author makes a mistake describing the set up of a chess board, perhaps an expert or someone with more knowledge could help update this article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edallen399 (talk • contribs)

Irish Chess?[edit]

This article says 'Fidchell' (in Irish; also called 'fidceall') and is not chess. Fair enough you think but then you go to the Irish wikipedia and see that ~~fidceall~~ ficheall is chess. SunCreator (talk) 03:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now resolved by the helpful people on the Irish wikipedia. Ficheall is Chess, while Fidchell is Fidchell. SunCreator (talk) 21:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am afraid there is no difference between ficheall and fidchell, they are different spellings for the same word, which always means chess in Irish. Incidentally this game cannot be the same as the diagram because fidhchell was set up with an equal number of pieces on both sides, as you can see in a comment added to the end at: http://www.indymedia.ie/article/95220 .Scolairebocht (talk) 06:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gwyddbwyll[edit]

Gwyddbwyll was the Welsh name for the game (and game board) known in Irish as Fidchell; this is attested in Bromwich's book, cited here. The modern Welsh name for chess is also gwyddbwyll, but the medieval references are clearly to the Celtic board game. As such it needs to be mentioned here.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Equal number of pieces?[edit]

I live in Ireland and have been playing Fidchell (and Brandubh) for most of my life and have never played with anyone that used an equal number of pieces. I have heard of the rule but never actually seen it being used. The only way I can see it working is if the defender plays with a "Weaponless King" (the king can't take part in captures) and the king can be captured by only two men. I'd love to know from someone who has actually used an equal number of pieces to play, what the games were like and how you balanced the games. Titan Crow 92.39.189.50 (talk) 10:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New articles on this topic[edit]

Recently, some new articles on this topic have been published:

Hall, Mark A.; Forsyth, Katherine (2011): Roman rules? The introduction of board games to Britain and Ireland. In: Antiquity 85 (330), pp. 1325–1338. http://antiquity.ac.uk/ant/085/ant0851325.htm

Niehues, Jan (2011): All the King's Men? On Celtic Board-Games and their Identification. In Franziska Bock, Dagmar Bronner, Dagmar Schlüter (Eds.): Allerlei Keltisches. Studien zu Ehren von Erich Poppe - Studies in honour of Erich Poppe. Berlin: curach bhán publications, pp. 45–60. http://www.curach-bhan.com/allerlei-keltisches-studien-zu-ehren-von-erich-poppe-p-3.html

Zemlod (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fidchell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]