Talk:Fetus-X

Cleaning-up[edit]

I am trying to clean-up and organize this article so it doesn't read quite so disjointed like it was written by so many different people over a long period of time. I'm just trying to make it easier to read; I do not intend to remove much information at this time. So, if I inadvertantly cut something, please feel free to add it back in where appropriate. -- Dragonfiend 03:15, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Movement?[edit]

Why is this not moved to Comixpedia? I was under the impression from all recent information I've found on the matter that all Webcomics were to be moved there. Is this an oversight? -- Jaimas 03:55 AM, 13 April 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 07:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

communist, satanic, and homosexual?[edit]

Was this written by a bunch of pissed off Jesus freaks or what? Just because some of the characters are devils doesn't mean Fetus-X is Satanic and just because some of the characters are gay doesn't mean this is a homosexual comic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swampypants (talk • contribs) 00:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assessment required[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 16:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I am failing this article because it has two major issues: referencing and image use. You need references for the comic's censorship, especially, since that is a potentially controversial claim, but also throughout the history section. On image use, we have one free image, which is great, but we also have one non-free image with no rationale, and neither image is being used informatively within the article. Since fixing these issues will require searching out additional sources (usually time-consuming) and possibly substantial rearrangement of the article format, I'm going with a fail rather than a hold. Feel free to resubmit the page once it's been updated. --erachima talk 00:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. I'll try to fix that stuff all up. Swampypants (talk) 03:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters[edit]

A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Past Tense?[edit]

The article says it "is" a weekly comic but I can find no evidence that it still exists. Does anyone know its status and when it became defunct, if it did? Bunnyhugger (talk) 05:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fetus-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Fetus-X. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]