Talk:Fantasia No. 2 (Mozart)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconClassical music: Compositions
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Role of Stadler[edit]

Is it possible to know the reasons why it is thought that Stadler "completed" this Fantasia ? Could these reasons be explained in the article ? Thanks. Marvoir (talk) 17:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Mozart's manuscript of the piano-and-violin version breaks off at the exposition, suggesting that the completion stems from someone else; the obituary published by Ignaz, Baron von Mosel for Stadler in 1833 in the Wiener Zeitschrift für Kunst, Literatur, etc. (quoted in the NMA preface for the violin sonatas, Vol. 2) notes that it was him. But it seems inconceivable that Mozart would have given the violin such a minor role in the work, as Hans Eppstein pointed out in 1968 (see the NMA preface for the individual piano pieces, Vol. 2), and it is possible that there may have been an original Mozart autograph of this piece in a version for piano solo that continued beyond the exposition. As for Stadler's completion of KV 396, it is musically so good that I will simply quote Beethoven on the Requiem: "If Mozart did not write the music, then the man who wrote it was a Mozart". Double sharp (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]