Talk:Falklands Crisis of 1770

Falklands Crisis of 1770 was created or significantly enhanced by WikiProject Reference Desk Article Collaboration, a project to leverage research efforts on the Reference Desks into a more lasting contribution to the encyclopedia. If you would like to help, please consider joining us.
See original question.Reference Desk Article CollaborationWikipedia:WikiProject Reference Desk Article CollaborationTemplate:WikiProject Reference Desk Article CollaborationReference Desk Article Collaboration articles

South America: Falklands Mid‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Falkland Islands work group (assessed as High-importance).

British Overseas Territories Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Falklands Crisis of 1770 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Falklands Crisis of 1770 nearly caused a war between Great Britain and Spain?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/August.

Wikipedia

Diplomatic success[edit]

The Falklands Crisis was a sure British diplomatic success by refusing to back down. There are sources that state this. In Three Victories and a Defeat the author says that Britain 'won' the Crisis. ChristiaandeWet (talk) 01:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've read both opinions, to be honest. Exactly what is your point? --Langus (t) 23:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The point to add it as an inclusion into the box itself. ChristiaandeWet (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Reference[edit]

It is said that " The Foreign Office "began to mobilise for a potential war". " and the citation for this is "Nicholas (1998), Oxford University Press, p. 103". Unfortunately, it's not clear who Nicholas is, this book is not mentioned anywhere else on the page. I'm sure it's just an accidental oversight but clarification would be welcomed. 209.151.140.63 (talk) 04:38, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- There were a couple of errors in the citation template. Now the title should be visible. Thanks! --Langus (t) 02:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.falklandshistory.org/getting-it-right.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Falklands Crisis (1770). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216085223/http://falklandshistory.org/gettingitright.pdf to http://www.falklandshistory.org/gettingitright.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Masseran[edit]

Luciano Coda, Better to talk here and get other opinions instead of having edit wars. You seem to be insisting on using the correct Spanish spelling of 'Masserano'. However, we should use the correct English spelling which appears to be 'Masseran'. You backed your choice of 'Masserano' with two Italian language sources which is a little pointless in my opinion. I have not thoroughly checked various English language sources to see which spelling is commoner. Others might have a comment to make? Roger 8 Roger (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roger 8 Roger, "Masserano" is not a Spanish word, but italian. It is the location where the princedom was.(See it:Principato di Masserano and it:Masserano, en:Masserano). That's why I cited italian sources (very rliable ones). The ambassador is it:Vittorio Filippo Ferrero-Fieschi (itwiki) prince of Masserano, he was ambassador of Spain charged by king Carlos III (not Spanish ambassador) because he is Italian and lived in Spain. Anyway my opinion is (basing on the following facts):

Since the location name of the Princedom (Masserano) was not translated into English or angliciced in the official page on Wikipedia, there is no need to keep foreign name versions like Maseran/Masseran/Maserano, because it is not useful to trace the location or the real person and there is no existing commoner english spelling.
See i.e. english:Duke of Cambridge, the location that gives the name is Cambridge. Italian:it:Duca di Cambridge, tha original name is kept, because there is no exiisting translation of Cambridge into italian.
1. i.e. english:King of Naples, but in Italian:it:Re di Napoli (the english translation exists)
2. i.e. Duke of Milan/it:Duca di Milano - as well - Milan/it:Milano

This is the point :) --Luciano Coda (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A quick search of google scholar gives me "prince of masseran = 9, "prince of maserno" = 0. I am not sure what relevance has the Italian language or a wiki commons page to references to this debate, which is about this English language article. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 22:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]