Talk:Fairmile A motor launch

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fairmile A motor launch article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	World War II task force

First sentence[edit]

Having read the MOS regarding opening sentences, I cannot see why the repetitive form which I edited was superior to the one which I replaced it with.

I suggest the editor read the two sentences aloud for comparison. The improvement will become very clear.

FWIW, I could not see the element of the MOS where repetition of particular phrases in close frequency was specified, either explicitly or implicitly. Additionally, please see the article on the Northrop F-89 Scorpion for a first sentence which really does need some sorting out in the manner which the editor here would rather see, but for which same effort I was reprimanded by an editor for 'needless repetition'. There really does appear to be some inconsistency at play, which makes my job, as a reader who voluntarily resolves weaknesses in WP text, very difficult indeed.

I will certainly say that the restoration of the historical context - time and usage - is a fair compromise at least, so I do appreciate that. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:6C5D:CC5E:B60B:9D06 (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]