Talk:FC U Craiova 1948

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia Guidelines[edit]

Hi there--

Please remember to consult Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not when editing. In particular:

  • Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files.... There is nothing wrong with adding a list of content-relevant links to an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia.
  • Wikipedia is not a soapbox, or a vehicle for propaganda and advertising. Therefore, Wikipedia articles are not propaganda or advocacy of any kind. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to approach a neutral point of view.

Tim Pierce 19:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, to the other person who's editing this article :-)

I'm open to discussion about the best way to edit the Universitatea Craiova article. If you feel that some of the forum discussions are particularly relevant then they should probably be left in. But having more links than text is usually not the right way to go. :-)

Some of the text is problematic because it doesn't have a neutral voice, like:

  • "...and the most popular roumanian team."
  • "The club's proud history includes ..."
  • "...for several years one of the top Romanian clubs..."
  • "Fans hate: Dinamo and Steaua Bucharest"

I'm completely willing to compromise on the text but I think it's important that an encyclopedia stick to verifiable facts, not to opinion -- even if it's a widely held opinion. -- Tim Pierce 19:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ok Tim....Hi I'm "the other person" :D ...... maybe you're wright and I'm wrong... I do understand that it must be distressing :) you seem so convincted..... maybe you must find a better cause "Fans hate: Dinamo and Steaua Bucharest" ...belive me, it's true :D .....do what do you what.......bye Ah...Merry-Christmas and Happy new year! :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.71.73.17 (talk • contribs) .

  • Hi! Thanks for writing back. :-) The principles I'm trying to follow here are Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Cite sources. It would be all right to say something like "The Romanian Football Quarterly has said that Universitatea Craiova is the most popular Romanian team," and include a link to an article that says so, for example. Or that "Fans posting to the UC message board have criticized Steaua Bucharest," and include a link to that posting. I believe you, but the important thing is not what you or I believe -- the important thing is whether it can be documented. :-) Does that help? Tim Pierce 15:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The newly created user User: Steel1 came right here & reverted the version I've formatted & from which I've removed the POV. I fear an edit war, because we're dealing with someone not familiar and not wanting to get familiar with NPOV. --Vlad 11:08, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Josh Mitchell[edit]

when you type the words "Josh Mitchell" or click on his name, you end up at the club web site. Can somebody fix this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.4.56 (talk) 11:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POV[edit]

The editors that keep reverting my changes doesn't seem to have read the above. The phrase: "Over the last 41 years,even the others teams fans (Steaua or other team) can't deny our supremacy despite this sad moment for us(the club was relegated to the Second Division, this year, for the first time, after 41 years, and Ion Oblemenco stadium was suspended for three matches ).", besides being poorly formatted, cannot belong to the article. The article must speak from a neutral point of view. When someone reads it what should (s)he understand: that the team itself wrote it? For the record, because of somewhat same issues, the Romanian version of the article was highly disputed too (but the POV was not so blatant). --Vlad 12:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a side note: as soon as I've started expressing interest in this article, there are plenty of editors that seem to come from nowhere, struggling to keep the article like it was. I understood that this cannot be assimilated to sockpuppeting, because there is no voting involved. But as it gives the false impression that there are more users, I wonder if it's not the same user that keeps creating accounts & changing the article. What is to be done in this case? --Vlad 12:51, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • :D ce faci vlad? ai blocat asa si l-ai lasat de atunci blocat, doar ,doar nu mai intra nimeni sa modifice ceva? :D

ai preluat un articol excelent, munca altora iar tu ai venit sa distrugi, apoi ti-ai protejat distrugerea...dar nu ma astepam sa ramana asa pe sest blocata, de atunci ma? :D of, of, of mai, mai , mai :D ah sa nu uit, era in engleza pagina...get a life vlad :D

Please stick to English. Or your English is not good enough (see Talk:Oltenia). I'm no admin here. And the advice you gave me, well, you should apply to yourself. Starting again with your petty acuses? You must not see the evidence put it right under your nose: I did nothing but to format it & there were other people who agreed it was better formatted. So stop trolling. --Vlad 14:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone please revise this article? It's horribly written and extremely biased, as well as littered with typical Romanian and regional Balkanisms "Bucharest teams represent poltical corruption, etc." Thanks.

Fair use rationale for Image:Universitatea-Craiova.png[edit]

Image:Universitatea-Craiova.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Universitatea-Craiova.png[edit]

Image:Universitatea-Craiova.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding External Link to Liga1 Homepage[edit]

Remove links to made for adsense sites, and old blogs which are returning 404. Add link to point to the impartial, factual portal for liga 1 at liga1.gamebookers.com - link should point to club page for relevancy. adrian recordings (talk) 00:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by User:Roby Iliescu[edit]

I ask User:Roby Iliescu to stop removing referenced info and to add only sourced text. 79.117.155.123 (talk) 09:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 6 June 2015[edit]

Roby Iliescu (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC) The team is not dissolved, they will play next season in Liga IV-Dolj County.[reply]

The above assertion is not true. And obviously, unsourced,79.117.176.12 (talk) 23:02, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on FC Universitatea Craiova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FC Universitatea Craiova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:FC_U_Craiova_1948&oldid=1201948779"