Talk:FCA India Automobiles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Fiat Automobiles India LimitedFiat India Automobiles Limited – wrong name. >Typ932 T·C 18:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 9 April 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: IAR early close, moved back to original name. The editor who moved the page has been blocked as a sock (and as such is fair game for reverting since they were evading a block), and I am treating their mass undiscussed renames as disruptive and undoing them. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC) GeneralNotability (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Stellantis IndiaFCA India Automobiles – Name has not changed. Arturo Ungaro Can Ergen has been carrying out a series of wholly unfounded moves, replacing all mentions of FCA/Chrysler/Fiat with "Stellantis." Until the names are actually changed, titles should remain. See fiat-india.com/ as well.  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Undiscussed move which cited no sources. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support YBSOne (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, relisting to add another 15 articles with the same problem, hope that's acceptable. Andra Febrian (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 11 April 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

– Reverting page moves without any discussion, as per discussion at Talk:Stellantis India. The new name is WP:CRYSTALBALL as these subsidiary companies haven't announced their new name after the merger of FCA and PSA to Stellantis. Also requesting move protection for all of these articles if possible. Andra Febrian (talk) 14:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also * Stellantis PolandFCA Poland YBSOne (talk) 14:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, added. Andra Febrian (talk)
Support - I have tried discussing with this user, but they persist in adding false information and non-existing websites such as stellantis-india.com/.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have undone the moves by Arturo Ungaro Can Ergen (disruptive mass renaming by a block-evading editor) as WP:BANREVERT/WP:IAR; however, several of these moves were made by other editors so I have left them as-is. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added more that belong to this group and struck those already reverted. I support all of these reverts, though I think they should just be put before WP:RMT. IceWelder [] 11:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.