Talk:Extinction (psychology)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Spantalian76 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: TGBTG2022.

71.40.28.18 18:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)With Extinction.How would you describe the procedure used to treat phobias?[reply]

Untitled[edit]

This is a good point. It might be useful to include a section on clinical applications of extinction where the parallels to exposure therapy are outlined. Melissza (talk) 12:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it would make for a more comprehensive article. Maybe we could add a section on this? Ce1734 (talk) 21:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2022 and 29 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Spantalian76.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

merge with operant conditioning[edit]

There is substantial information on extinction in operant conditioning page. The material could be reorganized or merged. Kpmiyapuram 14:14, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not expand the article before merging, see if there's anything that might merit its own page? Correct me if i'm wrong, but extinction does apply in classical conditioning, right?--Janarius 01:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the extinction can be a separate article on its own merit and hence i have changed the tag. Kpmiyapuram 14:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC) We could probably use a little more information on classical conditioning. In addition, there are still many statements that are not referenced in the article. Ce1734 (talk) 21:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only 1 reference?[edit]

I think we can do better. --1000Faces (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. For example, under theories, it might be helpful to provide references for the specific models referred to, e.g.:

  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87(6), 532-552.
  • Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Melissza (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

we can do better[edit]

This is a large field that has occupied the work of many great scientists for almost 100 years. There needs to be much broader and correct attribution of ideas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scholar38 (talkcontribs) 22:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one entry in successful extinction procedures? No mention of ABA either? We can definitely expand in this area.Spantalian76 (talk) 15:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Extinction (psychology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Extinction (psychology until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]