Talk:Expedition to the Ruins of Greyhawk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger discussion[edit]

When discussion the history of Castle Greyhawk, this module is definitely part of it, but taken away from it, it is jut any other module. I believe there would be more context if it was merged into the castle article. Turlo Lomon 06:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge. I don't think this needs to be it's own, almost advertisement section-- everything notable could be merged right over. --64.115.160.242 (talk) 19:05, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do Not Merge. Due to length, I think that this article should be kept on its own, maybe with a mention and link in Castle Greyhawk. -Drilnoth (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Added some reviews. Anyone else? Hobit (talk) 02:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Expedition to the Ruins of Greyhawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Expedition to the Ruins of Greyhawk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]