Talk:Expectation (epistemic)

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Epistemology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

Some thoughts[edit]

Expectation may differ from person to person. Everybody in the world has some expectations. Expectations increases creativeness of a person. An Expectation may or may not be realistic. Expectation has its own merits and demerits. If something expected happened it is a surprise else it is a disappointment. Always, try to expect more to get things done. An expectation is something we look forward to happening. Example, "I expect you to graduate from high school on time." This is saying that I look forward to seeing you graduate on time. Example, "I expect you to find a job and support yourself." This means I look forward to seeing you get a job and start supporting yourself.

By Trichur Ganesh. Chennai.

Anyone care about this article?[edit]

My expectation was that this would redirect to expected value. The value of THIS article is, as I see it, very little. A redirect would be better. Graft | talk 20:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the 'see also' section is very useful if you want to look something up related to expectations, but you don't know the name of what you're looking for. You need somewhere to start searching, and this page is one of those good starting points. VDZ (talk) 20:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"See also" list[edit]

While I do support the existence of this article, I don't really see the point of at least half of the "see also" links. (I mean, seriously, "Charm"? "Evil eye"??) How about a big cleanup of these? Nieske 09:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Undue weight[edit]

Struck a strangely lengthy (double the size of all other prose) section dedicated to coverage of some likely non-notable 1991 scholarly text. No harm in revisiting the topic in a less bulky format after expanding the article as a whole, but please do not rv - Would be little different from spamming. MrZaius^talk 17:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]