Talk:Ex officio member

United States

Is the president of the united states also the commander-in-chief ex officio? Raffamaiden (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Disposition

This is a mess (see ex-officio) in saying

An ex-officio member was a member of a colonial legislative council or an executive council. They were civil servants who served in a colonial government, appointed to sit in a council or both councils alongside with unofficial members. Ex-officio members were also appointed to unelected or partially-elected municipal councils and district councils.

and i'm going to take a stab at it.
It might be good to turn it into a list with three sections:

• Bodies whose ex-officio members may vote
• Bodies whose ex-officio members may not vote
• Bodies whose with both voting and non-voting ex-officio members

This would support lks clarifying which status is intended by the articles and lists that lk to it. If it grows sufficiently, it could be split into 2 or 3 smaller lists.
A history of the development of the practice belongs in the first section, again until such time as that can become a free-standing article.
--Jerzy•t 03:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Article is a mess

Ex officio applies to coporate boodies, bu this article wanders through national bodies as well. This is as much more a Corporate stub as it is a "Government" stub and I feel the national issues don't belong in this article. Askthecoolcookie (talk) 02:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree, the government stuff should be removed, is there any major objection? Rjljr2 (talk) 19:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

European Court of Human Rights

Probably worth noting that in the ECHR, when a case is brought to the (7-judge) Chamber against a state, the judge belonging to that state is entitled to sit ex officio and is generally expected to vote on the issue. When a case comes to the (17-judge) Grand Chamber then the same right extends to the President and Vice President of the court. The rest of the members are drawn by lot from the total pool of 47 judges.

Notable because its an auspice of a major international treaty (the amended european convention on human rights) which uses the term and illustratively helpful because it demonstrates the difference between ex officio and random drawing of members without a change in voting rights

It might be hard to accurately blurbify so i'll leave it for a while and see if somebody else would like to fit it in first Bob House 884 (talk) 14:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ex officio member. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131522471500/http://www.robertsrules.com/faq.html to http://www.robertsrules.com/faq.html#2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 28 December 2016 (UTC)