Talk:Evangelical Friends Church International

Name change

EFI has changed its name to Evangelical Friends Church International, EFCI. The changes have been made within the article but the title of the article is still wrong causing links to the new, proper name to work improperly. Can this be fixed? I am going to go create a EFCI article and link it to this one if I can. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.154.63.77 (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Are they a part of the RSoF?

I know that EFI is generally considered to be part of the Quaker family, but they don't anywhere identify themselves as being part of the RSoF on their website. Nor do their constituent YMs, it seems -- they use the phrase "Friends Church" or "Church of Friends", or "Yearly Meeting of Friends". Perhaps a distinction should be made between Quakerism and the RSoF? Zach (wv) (t) 04:30, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Zach Alexander, how do you define Quakerism and the Religious Society of Friends, then? And how do you distinguish between the two?Logophile 13:47, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Actually he touches on a good point. It is my understanding that within EFI there is debate about offically creating their own church and becoming the Evangelical Friends Church (EFC). I suspect that debate is related to the lack of discussion of the RSoF on their site. Until EFI offically declears itself to be a different demonination (which I expect will happen slowlly and quietly) I believe that EFI is properly termed Quaker as they have a Quaker history and most YM's within the organization still consider themselves Quaker. --Ahc 04:05, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

But Zach Alexander's basic question is whether we should distinguish between Quakerism and RSoF, and whether EFI should be classified as part of the first but not part of the second. For me you have muddied the water, Ahc, by saying that EFI is properly termed "Quaker." Do you mean that they are or are not part of the RSoF? Logophile 06:55, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Logophile, I think the difference between Quakerism and the RSoF could just be that Quakerism refers more to the general ethos and theology/theory side (maybe summed up as an inward, listening spirituality) and RSoF refers to the more institutional side -- YMs, committees, and the like. Obviously they shade into each other -- like, the way we do business meetings is on the one hand an institutional/RSoF thing, but also an ethos/Quaker thing, since it springs very naturally from the Quaker spirit, IMO. Another thing to think of is that there were Quakers before there was a RSoF, which wasn't a phrase used until the mid 1700s I don't think. Also, I think Howard Brinton makes a distinction between the two in his Friends for 300 Years; I bet he has in mind a similar distinction, tho I can't be sure since I haven't more than skimmed it yet. Zach (wv) (t) 22:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Uniqueness

Under the heading "Uniqueness of EFI among Friends", it is implied that the difference between EFI and other Friends is the emphasis placed on the Bible and view of Salvation. I believe these do descibe views that are used to seperate many Quaker groups from the Yearly Meetings that are associated with Friends General Conference, but does not differentiate between EFI and orthodox Quakers(Friends United Meeting). There are other independant and Conservative Quakers that may also hold these same views as Evangelical Friends. It is my POV that some better differences could be added to distinguish EFI from FUM. I am not knowledgeable about EFI to know what beliefs set them apart, but I am interested in learning.Carterponds 20:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Honestly I haven't read that section with care in the past. It's in great need of editing as it does seem to distinguish EFI from FGC more then from FUM. The comments on salvation are, in my experience, the most accurate in the section. The statement of practice are just inaccurate when compared with FUM's structure and the statements on the bible do seem to over state the case some. That said, I don't really have the time to correct this section at the moment, hopefully someone get work on that soon. --Ahc 14:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I edited this section. As a member of EFI, NWYM, I can categorically state it was completely inaccurate. There are certainly exceptions, in every group of Friends. But EFI and NWYM as a whole embraces the peace testimony, and puts the Spirit at the center, not the written Bible. As Ahc said, the salvation party was the most accurate, and as Carterponds said, what is listed in this section more differentiates EFI from FGC than FUM- which doesn't make much sense, considering that FUM is the smallest of the three main Quaker branches. Abdul Muhib 23 September 2007

the FUM article says its the largest in terms of membership.--Natcase 11:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

is there a way to distinguish EFI from FUM, other than views on interaction with non-quakers decades ago? Its difficult to tell by visiting Yearly Meetings. By the way FUM IS the biggest, by far, The Kenyan Yearly meetings belong to FUM... I would guess that the smallest would be the Beanites (Pacific and North Pacific Yearly Meeting) though, I don't think they are formally organized, or if you want formal lines of communication other than one setting the other off... the Conservative yearly meetings (Ohio, North Carolina, Iowa) (Member of EFI, through EFC-MAYM, used to attend a MAYM affiliated 'unprogramed' worship group. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.246.173.167 (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Distinctives from other Friends, as well as distinctives from other evangelicals continues to need reworking. Re: Religious Society of Friends vs Quaker - I don't see a significant difference, although I understand the attempted distinction above. Locally, my church uses "Friend" or "Evangelical Friend", but rarely uses "Quaker". The reason is a communication issue. A traditional perception doesn't fit our congregation. Neither do we want to confuse people by needing to distinguish between Christocentric Quakers and non-Christocentric Quakers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tecumsehmaverick (talk • contribs) 03:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evangelical Friends Church International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160205104955/http://nwfriends.org/ to http://nwfriends.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 25 September 2017 (UTC)